 |
How a New
Community Leadership Training Works: hierarchies out, networks in
The
new community leadership training proposed here will help to 'level the
playing field' so that new people will become active in exploring what
needs to be done - and how - in their
communities.
How do you
feel at the end of a community cohesion strategy meeting
or staff or volunteer training event?
Like this:
"... people
are frustrated by the way decisions get made. We
all try to be troopers. People may complain, but then they say, 'Well,
I trust the leadership to come up with the best thinking.' But behind
closed doors people wonder if the leaders really do have all the
information, especially when the decisions affect people who've had no
input."

Are unexpressed doubts and fears the joker in your pack ...
representing missed opportunities and lost wisdom ...?
Or like this:
"The
atmosphere was one of calm and tranquility, and
everyone commented on how a complex problem had inroads made with no
talking down, no interruption, and
true use of the talents in the room."
Perhaps the difference is here:
"Next time
you're in a meeting, watch the rituals ... the dueling
egos, turf protection, talking-without-listening. Maybe it's
time for a different kind of ritual. Something old."
One corporate leader says (I might be imagining things, but I hear an
almost plaintive, beseeching note! Do you hear it?) ...
"This is
amazing! Why haven’t I heard these things before? We need to
keep this process going permanently in this division."
The last three quotes are from leaders reflecting on their experiences
of
strategy, organizational or partnership development meetings ... and
of the process described in this article.
If you're interested in how that "something old" can be used to deliver
community leadership training, you'll be interested in this article.
And if you've
not heard about this stuff before, we're proud to say:
"... you heard it here first,
folks!"
Community leadership training: how this article
is organized
Next, through this spoof memo, we locate the Community Circle process
in a general discussion of community cohesion and community leadership
training.
Following that section, we describe the Community Circle process in
detail.
To conclude we look at how this process might form part of a broader
community leadership programme, incorporating
- community leadership training
- mentoring of trainees to enable them to cascade
the process
- addressing trainees' in action learning sets, or
- by providing 1-1 or 1-small group coaching
Our basic community
leadership training approach is that participants
learn best when their learning process incorporates all the stages in
the process they intend to deliver.
For community or organizational leaders, the community leadership
programme will focus on real, immediate issues they confront as leaders
(as managers, heads of sections or divisions, as a charity board of
trustees, or students, or volunteers, for example).
Memo:
Community Leadership Training
From:
Leadership-Development-Coaching.com
To:
A N Community Cohesion Officer, AnyCity
Council
Re:
Possible use of a “Community
Circle” approach to Community Cohesion and Community
Leadership
Training.
To
write this memo to best effect, we've made a few general assumptions
about the specific problems you face. We'll nail the details when we
meet.
We
want to ensure that we can focus on issues that really test our
process in this area of work
and provides you with some benefits that
are meaningful to you and your
team(s).
We
want to assure you that explore this approach is robust enough to
create impact in the most difficult situations.
Briefly
we run a powerful consultative process that gets people talking in
new, unexpected and insightful ways. It challenges old habits and
norms, breaks the mould, invites a different kind of participation,
values difference and diversity and is respectful of all viewpoints.
We
offer a process that involves members of a “community” (of
professionals; community leaders; community members, etc.) meeting
to discuss issues of concern to them and deciding on appropriate
action and leading its implementation.
In
some ways “mixed groups” of professionals / service providers and
the least vocal, least experienced create the greatest challenge - and
therefore provide the greatest opportunities.
Experienced people frequently lead and dominate discussions. They
also tend to be most restricted by the status quo.
This
is largely unconscious. We all invest energy in doing only what we
believe is possible. Our beliefs are determined by experience to date.
They are usually deeply conservative (they conserve the status quo).
They make up the "box" we need to "think outside."
How
many people start a meeting really believing: "Anything is possible!"
Yet real innovation needs that, otherwise the best changes we can hope
for are simply re-hashes of the status quo.
[Memo ends]
How
does the Community Circle approach challenge conservative beliefs,
level the playing field and create openness to new insights?
Community Leadership training: outline of the
overall approach
The
process is based on tribal councils used in some native cultures.
It
is openly democratic. It creates a sense of
responsibility and accountability.
That
makes this process a great leveler. It is experienced as culturally
“neutral” (it does not privilege those who are familiar with
traditional meetings (agendas, minutes, action points and so on).
There
is time for individuals to be heard, for reflection, for the ‘hidden
wisdom’ (locked in unvoiced fears and concerns, unheard voices,
ideas constrained by existing norms) to emerge and be evaluated by
the group as a basis for planning action.
The
unfamiliarity of this approach has been used widely – in all kinds
of settings – to encourage people to break out of their normal
roles and expectations.

Community
Circles provide an effective community leadership training
opportunity. Everybody leads for at least a small proportion of time.
Participants
listen - and reflect on what they hear - for a far greater proportion
of time than is the case in even
the best facilitated groups.
This is the simple basis from which new
insights arise.
In
many groups and group processes the theme is handed on, embellished,
argued with, confronted and teased out by individuals in turn. This
is a process of narrowing down of constraining and focusing. The old
way was for group members work with a theme as if it were a closed
question.
Closed
questions restrict the flow of new insights. They – of necessity –
carry assumptions about the nature of the issue under discussion.
They have a place later in the process.
We'll now develop these ideas further.
Community
Circles as community leadership training
Our previous
article on community
and cohesion
looked at some of the failures of community leadership. What I'd like
to do now is explain how the process we use helps to overcome these
failures of leadership development.
Community
Leadership Training: opening questions, opening minds, opening the
process
It's important that participants are prepared for a different kind of
meeting process and room layout. Invitations will flag this up - but in
a very general way.
First we set the tone with a round of introductions: participants
introduce themselves and say a little about their reasons for being in
the group (this is varied when groups know each other).
We then begin to explore each person's perspective on the main purpose
of the meeting.
We
start by keeping an open perspective; with an open question
that might
sound (in a community leadership training session, for example)
something like this:
"We're
here because this community has difficulties. As members of this
community you experience those difficulties every day. You are the
experts. We are all here to help each other uncover and
express what they know.

"There
are twenty different points of view in the room. We all experience
things differently. We're here to provide an opportunity for those
experiences to be heard: each one is valuable because
it is unique. It's your own point of view we want to hear.
“Tinkering
with or tweaking what's already happening is unlikely to create
changes that make a real difference to you – let's see if we can
wipe the slate clean and start from scratch.”
Initial
Community Cohesion Circle

Participants
speak in turn initially. They introduce themselves and explain their
concerns about the issues that provide the broad focus of the circle.
They announce when they have finished speaking. the next participant
does the same.
This is repeated until all issues are aired.
We
dissuade cross-talking, jokes, asides, discussion and argument at this
stage. The basic ethic is that everyone is the expert in their own
experience. Nobody has a right to challenge any individual's
interpretation of what is true for them and their unique life
experience.
The process:
- Avoids battles of will and conflicts of ego
- Provides adequate time to listen
- Participants feel listened to and respected
- People begin to feel empathy for others' points
of view
- Provides a shared experience from which novel
understanding arises
The chief
community leadership training benefits are:
- the
value of listening
- the
value of waiting for surprise insights to emerge
- experience
of an (implicit) shared leadership process
- shared
leadership becomes explicit in practice
"Experts" tend
to close down discussion
too quickly.
Stemming essentially from the expectation that leaders know best (and
therefore pre-judging best outcomes) but also possibly from insecurity
in dealing with conflict.
This process is flexible and open to each participant to fill as they
see fit.
At the end of this process the group has identified one or a number of
issues, questions or sub-themes.
These are prioritized.
We use a simple ranking system akin to the nominal group technique
to overcome some of the problems that large group discussions and
brain-storming can lead to.
This also helps to ensure that issues that
are important to minorities are identified and given appropriate value.
At the end of this process the whole group agrees which question best
focuses the needs of the group as a whole.
Formation of
sub-groups by self-selection
Different perspectives are used to shed light on the key question.
Participants assign themselves to a sub-group (or sub-groups) to
further their exploration.
Groups
and individuals may - if appropriate - re-group in a cafeteria-style
setting.
Each table represents a particular perspective on the topic. Each
sub-group will have at least
one permanent member to record the views of those who choose to
contribute to it.
It is
important that each sub-group remains 'faithful' to the perspective it
is responsible for.
Individuals are responsible for reflecting on the key question from the
particular perspective they chose.
At this stage, the focus is on what is best for the group as a whole.
Individuals must agree to shelve their personal point of view in favour
of the particular perspective they have assumed responsibility for.
During this part of the process there are more community leadership
training outcomes :
- new perspectives emerge
- people network with a number of different people
- small groups clarify and challenge issues
- one-to-group practice of empathizing,
listening, clarifying
- negotiation and values clarification as
individuals discuss their own perspectives
- new friendships an alliances form
- individuals and sub-groups support each other
in preparation of recommendations to the Community Cohesion Circle
The
next stage in the community leadership training cycle is the
presentations back to the group as a whole.
Each sub-group reports back to the whole circle from its
partcular perspective (see below for an explanation of the
perspectives).
Individuals process the ideas from sub-groups,
now asking key questions about proposed actions. The role of
the whole group is to find the wisest ways forward.
The critical task at this stage is to
identify
actions that offer leverage over the critical question(s) identified in
stage one.

It is important to use a variety of ways of evaluating the strength of
proposals for action.
The eight lenses are:
- Freedom
and creativity - to what extent have we freed ourselves
from prior expectations? Are we excited and enthusiastic?
- Perceptual
clarity - are we seeing the issues clearly? What might
hamper this?
- Emotional
intelligence - have we confronted fears and addressed
issues of power? Are other strong emotions influencing us? How?
- Path
finding
- do our choices lead clearly to our goals? If we have a choice of
routes to goal, how do we choose the best?
- Sustaining
activity - can we maintain levels of activity required to
achhieve our goals? What drains us? What sustains us? How do we
best sustain ourselves to carry out the action plan we decide on?
- Predictive
intelligence - what have we done to ensure the
overall
integrity of our plan? Do the elements of the whole fit together? Is
the timing and sequencing of the roll out of our plan coherent?
- Decisiveness
- are our plans sharply focused enough to determine clearly the
actions we need to take?
- Energy
- do our plans create excitement and a desire to be engaged and take
the action steps to
realize them? Do we
want to sign up to this and commit time and energy. Will other
members of our community?
These are
reflective tools, enabling the group to ensure that plans do not have
gremlins hidden away in dark, unexplored corners!
More holistic outcomes of this community
leadership training
We
are keen to ensure that skills in the facilitation of these circles
are handed on as an explicit part of our work during
the community leadership training events and programmes we run.
Community
Circles could help Local authority workers and community
members collaborate to answer
their key questions:
Given a vision
like - “Our vision of an integrated and cohesive community
is based on three foundations”, what is needed for:
- People
from different backgrounds having similar life opportunities
- People
knowing their rights and responsibilities
- People
trusting one another and trusting local institutions to act fairly
How
would the community measure for itself that our community is a “…
place where people live in harmony and mutuality as cohesive
communities by understanding, valuing and celebrating the diversity
of our communities and by respecting our differences” for example?
Language
is very important – I wonder how the people from the communities
themselves express these aspirations? Do they share them, even?
Do we know? How do we find out?
This style of
community leadership training
provides a great opportunity for individuals to re-write this kind of
professional language in their own idioms.
We believe Community
Circles could contribute to:
- Promotion
of values of acceptance and respect between all communities
- Increasing
awareness of different cultures, backgrounds, faiths and beliefs
- Actively
busting myths by challenging stereotypes and
dispelling misconceptions
- Ensuring
that there is a comprehensive knowledge base of communities in
the LA catchment
- Answering
questions about: Whose
knowledge? What kind of knowledge?
- Addressing
issues of trust in acquiring that
knowledge and uses it may be put to (these are very familiar issues
in the Circle process)
- Improving
communication and information networks
- Developing
a strategy for supporting and welcoming newcomers
- Developing
opportunities for intergenerational interactions and activities
- Supporting
local social and cultural networks
- Organizing
an annual flagship conference / celebration around a leading community
cohesion theme
– what about an annual Circle?
- Developing
Community Circle members to become practitioners on their own patch
- meeting
with peers and others to agree standards and norms
- challenge
poor practice,
raising standards?
- creating
and validating new forms of evidence of community cohesion
- Encouraging
wide consultation by all partners to encourage involvement and
participation of diverse communities
- Improving
the
level of involvement in decision making and voluntary activity
- Supporting
opportunities to understand community cohesion issues and share best
practice
- Mainstreaming
community cohesion
- Ensuring
community cohesion links to other strategies
Community
leadership training and community leadership programmes
We
are keen to ensure that skills in the facilitation of these circles
are handed on as an explicit part of our work.
Elements in programmes vary depending on the needs of the communities
we work with: local neighbourhood communities, special interest groups,
faith groups, communities of practice, professional groups and so on.
The foundation of all our community leadership training is the
Community Circle process described here.
The focus of this circle is always provided by real, urgent issues that
group confronts. We do
not teach people what to do (or how to do it) in a
different professional setting, a setting outside the group itself.
We work with professionals on their own, heartfelt professional issues.
We begin with big, open, questions that are relevant to participants'
immediate needs and goals.
In this way, participants learn by real involvement and experience of
the power of the process. This is critical to creating a powerful, experiential learning process.
The transfer of new skills, knowledge and values - and 'bedding down'
of that new learning in leadership development outcomes is
supported by a combination of:
- individual and group or team mentoring
- individual and group or team coaching
- action learning sets
- shadowing facilitators
- facilitator observation of and feedback to new
community or circle leaders
- support through a cycle of
learning; design of service or intervention; implementation of
that intervention; evaluation and re-design
We hope these ideas about community leadership development intrigue,
entertain and excite you - as they do us.
If you'd like to discuss any of these ideas, lease feel free to contact
us on the number below, or using the "Contact us" form.
We look forward to hearing from you.

|
|
|