This case study explores university leadership development. I focus on a leadership development model called
"The Leadership Inquiry." I describe the process from inception, through implementation to evaluation.
The approach has many potential applications to corporate leadership and management development. I hope - through this case study - you will see particularly how the approach focuses on new knowledge development. It also develops social capital in the organization.
You should be able to visualize its potential beyond this specific approach to university leadership development.
This approach to university leadership development, called "The Leadership Inquiry" was born out of my experiences of working with many managers. They want to do an excellent job but are feeling increasingly isolated.
They have few opportunities to talk about the issues they face in their work. They welcome an opportunity to learn from one another.
Many of the current challenges faced by managers relate to leadership and the "soft skills". The workshop character of this approach to university leadership development provides immediate opportunities for feedback and new learning.
In times of change and uncertainty, a forum of trusted colleagues provides a safe space for exchange, learning and practice. It can become a valuable resource both for the managers and for their organization.
This case study reports on the experiences of a group of managers during the piloting of a new approach to university leadership development.
A large British institution piloted this approach to university leadership development approach with middle and senior managers from across the organization.
The Leadership Inquiry was set up as a "joint venture" with the internal training department. The following is part of an invitation that was emailed to 50 managers together with a more detailed brochure:
"NEW UNIVERSITY LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT PROJECT |
As a result, we recruited the 16 managers we wanted for the pilot. A few others were
disappointed. The training department felt this was an excellent response.
We even attracted some managers who had otherwise been reluctant to participate in "training courses" or use other university leadership development approaches that had been made available to them.
As each manager signed up for the series I contacted them personally. I welcomed them and asked them to identify two or three of their key leadership challenges.
These were analyzed and grouped into three main themes. The themes and some of the specific challenges are listed below:
Visionary Leadership
Self
Others
The complete list of challenges was discussed at the first Inquiry and agreement reached to begin with an exploration of visionary leadership.
Leadership Inquiry One -Visionary Leadership Development
The organization had recently created and published a vision statement and this was a good opportunity to explore in the large group what vision meant and what it might mean to be a visionary leader.
Armed with a short article, participants met in small groups to explore what being a visionary leader meant to them. Their findings were then discussed in the whole group.
At the end of the Inquiry, members were asked for feedback by completing the statement "As a result of this session ..."
Here are some of their responses:
|
One of the features of this approach to university leadership development is its flexibility ...
The issue of values came so strongly to the fore in the previous Inquiry that we agreed to focus on this topic at this session.
Again we had a large group inquiry into values -what they were, where they were present or not in the organization and the value of values.
Small groups explored examples of value statements from similar organizations.
Members identified the personal and organizational values that they felt were needed. They reported these back to the whole group.
In response to the question "As a result of this session ..."
People said:
|
Leadership Inquiry Three - Communication
Distilling the original challenges under the themes of Self and Others, this session looked into the question "Are you sometimes too aggressive or not assertive enough?"
Again, the flexibility of the Leadership Inquiry as a response to the specific university leadership development needs came to the fore ...
In the large group we explored examples of aggression and non-assertiveness from people's work. We discussed an Assertive/Responsive model as a way to make sense of some behaviours.
In small groups people explored the model further in relation to specific work examples and their own behaviour.
In response to the question "As a result of this session ..."
People said:
|
Participants where asked if they would recommend the Leadership Inquiry to their colleagues in the organization. All would be happy to except one who felt the format might be too "risky'.
Here are some of the reasons why they would recommend this approach:
|
In the busy-ness of today's organizations, managers rarely have the opportunity to look deeply into the issues they face.
It can be difficult to make sense (or not!) of what is happening to them, around them ... and to their teams, divisions and the organization as a whole.
This particular approach to university leadership development - The Leadership Inquiry - helps reduce some of the isolation managers feel. They see that others have similar feelings.
It helps them to explore together, through substantive and purposeful dialogue, the compelling issues they face.
They learn new approaches that they choose to take away and try out themselves.
In this example, the client was impressed by participants' claims of what they would do as a result of the leadership development workshop.
We were not in a position to follow these up formally. However, we have anecdotal evidence that many where being put into practice.
We also learned that the Leadership Inquiry is not for everyone - some people prefer a much more structured approach.
We understand of organizations as - for the most part - social structures. A model like the Leadership Inquiry is useful adds some glue to build a stronger community and increase social capital.
Whatever the organization, whenever the leadership development model needs to deliver this kind of outcome, the Leadership Inquiry approach should be considered.
The increase in social capital - as evidenced by this particular instance of university leadership development - is a strength of the approach.
In a knowledge economy we now largely accept that those organizations that can create and share new knowledge the fastest are most likely to succeed. The Leadership Inquiry elevates the quality of conversation about key leadership issues, and generates more knowledge capital.
It also ensures that capital is disseminated quickly through the organization. It is grounded in the participants lived experience of leading and managing.
Informal relationships from members of different divisions provide future support networks.
"University Leadership Development"
by Mike Bell, February 2004
If you would like to find out more about the processes we use in leadership training
and want to know more about our next workshop, click here:
forthcoming leadership development workshop and booking form.
For more general background to these leadership development workshops, participants reactions and case studies, take a look at the links in our general leadership development workshops page.
Copyright© www.leadership-development-coaching.com 2011 All rights reserved